hi, I do not understand the irony in the title ( to me it is irony, perhaps you did not mean it at all): this is some vital and brillant drawing with the charme of suddeness. "Tarzan" is this neoromantic topos of the wild and good seen by the decandent and civilized. To me the view on Tarzan is naiv in a way, that it does not ask for consequences. If you call it "Jason" or "Gilgamesh" or maybe "karlmarx in its younger days" it will run its way.
yours
Patrick
Posted Jul 21, 2008 8:09am
Want to leave a compliment?
Sign up for a free account, or sign in if you're already a member.
Compliments:
patrick feldmann:
hi, I do not understand the irony in the title ( to me it is irony, perhaps you did not mean it at all): this is some vital and brillant drawing with the charme of suddeness. "Tarzan" is this neoromantic topos of the wild and good seen by the decandent and civilized. To me the view on Tarzan is naiv in a way, that it does not ask for consequences. If you call it "Jason" or "Gilgamesh" or maybe "karlmarx in its younger days" it will run its way. yours Patrick
Posted Jul 21, 2008 8:09amWant to leave a compliment?
Sign up for a free account, or sign in if you're already a member.